CHAPTER I
FOREWORD
Modal is constitute one of type Auxiliary Verb that its prevalent is utilized to give associate savvy with competence, pretty much, allowing etc. That modal is alone available many kinds. Amongst those it can, could, shall, should or ought to, may, might, will, would, must, etc..
Base its division each, therefore that Modal has various logistic kind and utility. But in this paper will be worked through specially about must and have to. There is study even more fledged will be explained deep succeeding chapter.
CHAPTER II
DISCUSSION
MUST was utilized by declares for:
a. Pointing out liabilities, must or compulsion of think the speaker.
Ø I must study English.
Saya harus belajar bahasa Inggris.
Ø You must help each other.
Kamu harus tolong-menolong satu soma lain.
b. Revealing logical conclusion that can't disown its truth or to point out a strong assumption its truth.
Ø You must be tired after your tennis match.
Kamu tentunya lelah setelah pertandingan tennis.
Ø Idul Fitri must be happy day.
ldul Fitri tentunya menjadi hari yang membahagiakan.
c. In negative's sentence and makes answer of sentence question does ever be utilized NEED NOT or needn' t is not musn' t.
Ø Must I go now? yes you must atau yes you need.
Ø Must she pay it? no, she needn't.
Ø She needn't come here again.
Kamu tidak perlu datang ke sini lagi.
d. Must = have to means to have.
Ø You must (or have to) go to school now - She must (or has to) read this book
e. Must don't be made manifest past tense. Meaning by gone form "shall / must" is Had To, and its form with for all object.
Ø I had to meet my sister yesterday.
Saya harus berjumpa saudara perempuanku.
Ø She had to leave for
' Dia harus meninggalkan
f. Must don't be made manifest past tense. Nonetheless, if we mean are a conclusion, by gone form from must is must + have + V3 that is utilized to point out a certainty on past.
Ø They must have gone to
Mereka pasti sudah berangkat ke
Ø He must have frightened.
Dia sudah pasti ketakutan.
Must, Have, Will and Should
For Deduction and Assumption
Must used for deduction
Forms
Present
must + present infinitive: He must live here, or
must + continuous infinitive: He must be living here.
Past
must +-perfect infinitive: He must have lived here; or
must + continuous perfect infinitive: He must have been living here.
Note the difference between the past forms of must used for deduction and the past equivalent of must used for obligation: had to.
Must is not used for negative deduction and is not normally used in the interrogative except when querying a deduction with Must: There's a lot of noise from upstairs. It must be Tom. - Why must it be Tom? Other people use that flat.
Examples
He has a house in
I've had no sleep for 48 hours. - You must be exhausted.
He develops his own films. That must save him a lot of money.
I keep meeting him on the bus. He must livelmust be living near by.
The police are stopping all cars. They must be looking for the escaped prisoner.
What explosion? 1 didn't hear any. - You must have heard it! The whole town heard it!
He must have taken sleeping pills last night. He didn't wake up till lunch time.
1 waited under the clock! - So did I, but I didn't see you! We must have been waiting under different clocks.
It was 'a head-on collision, but the drivers weren't hurt. - They must have been wearing their seat belts.
Must (deduction) compared to may/might
The difference is best seen by examples:
a) Imagine that we have three keys on a ring and we know that one of these keys opens the cellar door. We might begin by picking one key and saying:
This may/Might be the key. (Perhaps this is the key.)
But after trying two keys unsuccessfully, we will pick up the third key and say This must be the key. No other choice remains.
MUST
in present's form
| Must | As | Had to | |
| He told me : “You must stay here until 10.00.” | He told me that I had to stay there until 10.00 | ||
| Ia memberitahu saya: “Kamu harus tinggal disini hingga pukul 10.00 | Ia memberitahu saya bahwa saya harus tinggal di | ||
in future's form
| Must | As | Would Have to | |
| He told me : “You must come again tomorrow.” | He told me that I would have to come again the following day. | ||
| Ia memberitahu saya: “Saya harus datang lagi besok.” | Ia memberitahu saya bahwa saya harus datang lagi pada hari berikutnya. | ||
prohibition or punishment
| Musn’t | As | Musn’t/wasn’t | |
| He told me : “You musn’t drive a car with out a licence.” | He told me that I musn’t drive a car without a licence. | ||
| Ia memberitahu saya: “KAmu tidak boleh mengendarai mobil tanpa SIM” | Ia memberitahu saya bahwa saya tidak boleh mengendarai mobil tanpa SIM. | ||
truth common no time change
| He told me : “The Sun rises in the East.” | He told me that the Sun rises in the East. |
| Ia memberitahu saya: “Matahari terbit di sebelah Timur.” | Ia memberitahu saya bahwa Matahari terbit disebelah Timur.. |
Elementary and Intermediate MUST AND HAVE TO
There is usually a difference of meaning between the present tense forms must and have to in affirmative statements:
Must expresses obligation or compulsion FROM THE SPEAKER'S VIEWPOINT.
Have to expresses External obligation.
Compare the following pairs of situations, where these two forms are used in their natural context.
You must go now. (I want to go to bed.)
What a pity you have to go now. (It's time for you to catch your train.)
We must begin before five (or we shan't finish in time for our supper).
We have to begin.before five. (That's the time arranged:)
They must take it away. (I won't have it here any longer.)
They have to take it away. ('They've been told to do so.)
He must stay the night. (I (we) press him to do so.)
He has to stay the night. (He can't get back tonight.)
He must move the furniture himself (for all I care; I shan't help him).
He has to move the furniture himself (poor chap; he's got no one to help him).
You must call me `Sir'. (I like it that way.)
You have to call me `Sir'. (That's the regulation address.)
You must change your shoes. (I won't have you in here with muddy feet.)
You have to change your shoes: (... such is the custom on entering a mosque.)
Am/is/etc. to is used for definite commands or prohibitions. This form, or must, is used for instructions on notices or orders (have to is never used here).
Passengers must cross the lines by the footbridge. (The railway company instructs them to.)
Porters often have to walk across the lines. (The nature of their work compels them to.)
All junior officers are to report to the colonel at once. (Military order)
Soldiers have to salute their officers. (Such is the custom.)
CHAPTER III
CONCLUSION
MUST was utilized by declares for:
a. Pointing out liabilities, must or compulsion of think the speaker.
b. Revealing logical conclusion that can't disown its truth or to point out a strong assumption its truth.
c. In negative's sentence and makes answer of sentence question does ever be utilized NEED NOT or needn' t is not musn' t.
d. Must = have to means to have.
e. Must don't be made manifest past tense. Meaning by gone form "shall / must" is Had To, and its form with for all object.
f. Must don't be made manifest past tense. Nonetheless, if we mean are a conclusion, by gone form from must is must + have + V3 that is utilized to point out a certainty on past.
g. Must, Have to For Deduction and Assumption
h. Must and have can be in future's form, prohibition or punishment, Elementary and Intermediate Must And Have To.
No comments:
Post a Comment